Canadian Government cherry picks when to stand up for Charter Rights

The Government of Canada owes Canadians an explanation

Omar Khadr came to a settlement with the Canadian government outside of court for $10.5 million, following the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court back in 2010 that Khadr’s Charter rights had been violated.

"The deprivation of [Khadr's] right to liberty and security of the person is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice," the court ruled.

"The interrogation of a youth detained without access to counsel, to elicit statements about serious criminal charges while knowing that the youth had been subjected to sleep deprivation and while knowing that the fruits of the interrogations would be shared with the prosecutors, offends the most basic Canadian standards about the treatment of detained youth suspects."

Khadr, was seeking $20 million in a wrongful imprisonment civil suit. He accused the Feds of being complicit in what he claimed to be an arbitrary detention and cruel and inhuman treatment at the hands of the American authorities.

While his actions and guilt is not in question, it should still be noted that Khadr was a 15 year old who was working with Al Qaida; comparatively Skylar Prockner has been given an adult sentence by Canadian courts for a murder he committed at 16. It is fair to say that at 15, a person understands right and wrong, and they can appreciate consequences to their actions.

In lieu of this, let’s remember that Khadr had confessed to killing a US army medic when he was 15, and while the interrogation that drew the confession was decidedly oppressive, Khadr went on to apologise to the families of the victims at his first press conference in Canada. In other interviews he still recalls throwing a grenade at the American Sgt. Christopher Speer, and questions what happens only by comparing it to the testimony of other witnesses. This compensation disregards the suffering of those American families, and other soldiers that fight our wars. It demerits the years of alliance that the US and Canada have had in combating violent terrorist attacks on western values.

Since the amount of the settlement has been disclosed, there has been a major uproar from Canadians on the amount of public funds being directed to private hands. One comparably large settlement with the government was the $2 billion compensation package awarded for the Indian Residential School system. The TRC report echoed by our Chief Justice called it a "cultural genocide". Individual settlements amounted to $10,000 per person who attended the school. Compare this to Khadr’s settlement and it seems grossly unjust to reward a former member of Al Qaeda with multiple times that amount.

Upholding Charter rights is essential to Canada’s foundation as a just and free country; consequently, the amount awarded when damages are sought should be proportionate to the Charter breach. There needs to be consistency among different cases, but it appears that the government is not concerned with that. Many residential school children faced years of physical and emotional abuse, they were often raped and purposefully separated from their families, but the government has essentially decided that their suffering is worth less than Omar Khadr’s.

The court should have been given the opportunity to decide what a fair compensation would be for the breach of Khadr’s Charter rights. It would ask the right legal questions and look at precedent, rather than act according economic and political pressure. In the end, there is something to be said about what we want to accomplish with taxpayer dollars; paying private citizens damages like these redirect money that could be put towards greater protecting Charter rights.

Governments swing back and forth on their agendas, and make big decisions in the process; decisions like this should be made with more thought. Decisions like this affect us fiscally, but more importantly they send the message that our government is sporadic and that our rights are valued and defended only when the government wants them to be.

Religious Freedom Needs To Be a Tenet of Qatar Diplomacy

Religious-Freedom-Needs-To-Be-a-Tenet-of-Qatar-Diplomacy.png

Rev. Majed El Shafie wrote to the U.S. Congress Foreign Relations & Foreign Affairs committees about the need to make religious freedom a tenet of Qatar diplomacy.

June 12, 2017

Dear Chairman Corker, Senator Cardin, Chairman Royce and Representative Engel,

The recent accusations against Qatar as a state sponsor of terrorism and severing of diplomatic ties by its neighbors reminded me that in just over 4 years Doha will host the World Cup. Since it was awarded this prize in 2012, FIFA’s decision has been mired in controversy.

The issues regarding the notoriously corrupt FIFA are well understood. I am writing about two other issues that the world must not lose sight of:

  • The brutal conditions the Qatari stadiums’ migrant builders are forced to work in, directed by a government that is exploiting this workforce in ways akin to slavery, with extraordinary death rates; and
  • The Qatari constitution establishes Islam as the state religion and relies on Sharia to serve as the foundation for the development of laws. Reports indicate Qatar TV has aired sermons containing anti-Semitic language, Qatari funded publishers produce anti-Semitic books and even a high-ranking Minister penned a forward of a poetry book containing anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. According to Open Doors’ 2017 World Watch List, Qatar ranks 20th of the most difficult nations to be a Christian. It remains a capital offense to convert from Islam and a conviction for blasphemy and proselytizing can garner a sentence of up to ten years in prison.

It may be too late to take the World Cup away from Qatar. But we should work together to pressure organizations such as FIFA – many of which have safely hidden behind Teflon-coated claims that global issues such as terrorism financing, labor rights and freedom of religion are none of their concerns – to make such issues front and center in any bid. After all, hosting the World Cup puts the global spotlight on the host country and its leaders.

As a victim or torture and persecution, I founded One Free World International to give a voice to those facing persecution and to work towards a world where all people can live free and worship as they believe. I respectfully request you make religious freedom a tenet of your approach as you deal with Qatar and, as importantly, with organizations such as FIFA.

Sincerely,

Rev. Majed El Shafie Founder and President One Free World International

CC: The Honorable Jim Risch, Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism

The Honorable Tim Kaine, Ranking Member, Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism The Honorable Christopher Smith, Chairman, House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations

The Honorable Karen Bass, Ranking Member, House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations

The Honorable Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Chairman, House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Middle East and North Africa

The Honorable Theodore Deutch, Ranking Member, House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Middle East and North Africa

The Honorable Trent Franks, Co-Chair, International Religious Freedom Caucus The Honorable Juan Vargas, Co-Chair, International Religious Freedom Caucus The Honorable Gus Bilirakis, Vice-Chair, International Religious Freedom Caucus The Honorable Jeff Fortenberry, Co-Chair, Religious Minorities in the Middle East Caucus

The Honorable Anna Eshoo, Co-Chair, Religious Minorities in the Middle East Caucus

The Honorable Randy Hutlgren, Co-Chair, Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission

The Honorable James P. McGovern, Co-Chair, Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission

OFWI in DC

IMG_5052-e1493317826633.jpg

Rev. El Shafie meets with decision makers on Capitol Hill

Safely home from Iraq & Syria, OFWI speaks out for victims of genocide and persecution in Washington, DC

WASHINGTON - Yazidis and Christians in Syria and Iraq need more support to live safely in their homeland. That was the message Rev. Majed El Shafie delivered to decision makers in Washington, DC this week. Having just returned from OFWI's Syria and Iraq mission to deliver needed medical supplies, Rev. El Shafie was briefing US officials on what OFWI learned and offered his insights to inform assistance to the region.

OFWI met with Representatives Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE), as well as legislative staffers from the offices of Rep. Eshoo's (D-CA) co-chair of the caucus on religious minorities in the Middle East, office of Senator Risch (R-ID), Chairman on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the near east and terrorism, and Senator McCain (R-AZ), the Chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

OFWI has helped rescue over 400 Yazidi women and girls from ISIS slavery and just delivered 1200 kg of medication and medical supplies that will help save 20,000 lives in Iraq and Syria over the next five months. More support is needed to continue the fight against ISIS to return stability to the region and protect the lives of religious minorities following ISIS's genocide.

OFWI also discussed the persecution of religious minorities in China and the ongoing use of blasphemy laws in Pakistan in attacks on the Christian community.

Stay informed and help where you can. Click here to sign up for OFWI's Action Alert subscribers list here.

Medical Supplies Delivered to Iraq & Syria

OFWI-Medical-Donations-e1493129323539.png

OFWI helps deliver $500K of medication and medical supplies to Iraq & Syria

OFWI in partnership with Food for the Hungry Canada has just delivered 1.25 tons of medication and medical supplies worth $500,000 to Iraq and Syria. The supplies were delivered to the Red Crescent Society and are being distributed throughout Iraq and Syria, including to Rojava and Aleppo.

These supplies will help treat 20,000 Christians, Yazidis and other minorities in refugee camps throughout the region, as well as those on the front lines fighting ISIS for the next five months.

Thank you to all of OFWI's supporters who donated to our campaign to making this delivery a reality. Your donations are making a difference and offering hope to the people facing persecution in Iraq and Syria. We could not have delivered these desperately needed supplies without your support.

M-103 a step backwards for Canada

MP-Contact.png

By Majed El Shafie, President & Founder, One Free World International

A dash to the finish is not always a win.

A well intentioned motion, with the potential to result in a greater sense of community and awareness between Canadians, now also has the ability to isolate, misinform and perpetuate the violence and hate it intends to eliminate.

Canadians have raised concerns with the anti-Islamophobia motion M-103, brought by Mississauga-Erin Mills MP Iqra Khalid. Instead of listening to their concerns and encouraging discussion on a topic that affects most communities in Canada, the government chose to end the parliamentary debate.

If the government had been willing to encourage dialogue on the topic, they would have heard Canadians want more answers. The haste displayed by the government reveals a lack of interest in the concerns of Canadians and a total disregard for addressing them.

The question most are asking is what is Islamophobia? The lack of a clear definition not only jeopardizes the reliability and clarity of law, but also creates uncertainty for larger charter right concerns of free speech. Are constructive discussions of Islam that share knowledge and highlight concerns under question and suspicion? An act must be clearly defined before it can be condemned.

Rushing through due process leaves many feeling shunned from the dialogue and the lack of transparency – something the Liberal government has claimed to pursue and advocate – is creating an endemic of misinformation, leading many to believe the worst of the motion.

Leaving people out of the dialogue results in a restless social atmosphere; people who feel they are not being heard are more willing to push extremes in an attempt to be heard. Look south of the border and their experience should be a warning of caution for Canadian legislators that should be considering all outcomes of their decisions before they make them.

The motion focuses on a number of priorities that Canadians would encourage: collecting data to conceptualize hate crime reports, a heritage committee study to develop an approach aimed at reducing and eliminating religious and race based discrimination, and community centered responses to hate crimes. These goals however, are harder to appreciate when they appear to benefit one community.

Canada’s criminal code provides the legal framework to address threats of violence and public incitement of hate through S.319, and the case development surrounding hate speech has strived to strike a balance with the Freedom of Expression, in s.2(b) of the Charter.

At the risk of being politically incorrect, it is necessary to highlight those that have committed violent crimes in the name of Islam, in Canada. The 2014 shooting on Parliament Hill and Quebec attack caused the deaths of two Canadian soldier on Canadian soil; both attackers’ motive was his association to radical Islam.

Canadian police and intelligence services have been crucial in tracking and preventing various plans of attack inspired by radical Islam before they have unfolded. The value in remembering these realities is to note that Islam remains vulnerable to extreme and violent interpretation, and while Islamophobia has had its share of violent consequences, shunning any constructive discussion or singling out one extreme will not build community in Canada.

Raising these concerns is not Islamophobic. The concerns of many with M-103 is its lack of reference to existing laws, and its lack of appreciation for statistics that show that the largest victims of hate crimes are Jewish members of our society. The key is to ensure that religious sensitivity does not overshadow our value in being Canadians. Religious freedom applies to all and laws that protect against religious hate crimes should protect all.

To those that will decide what comes of M-103, dialogue should encourage the sharing of ideas and constructive critiques that bode well for all elements of society. The personal right of expression is a benefit to the public sphere. When striving to strike a balance, the gains made by society should not be overlooked. Expressing thought and exchanging ideas should not be treated as privileges threatened to be taken away in tough times. The idea should not be to limit ideas and speech but to encourage its intellectual, compassionate and constructive elements. This path may ask for more work, but it also deserves it.

Majed El Shafie is the President and Founder of One Free World International. OFWI.org | @OFWI